The Big Antenna List


VHF / UHF antennas

VHF / UHF — handheld

ABBREE AR-152A 2 m / 70 cm half-wave tactical “blade” foldable ($12) SMA-F / 19 in / 20 W / 0.0 dBd

For the SMA-M version see Amazon

ABBREE AR-152A 2 m / 70 cm half-wave tactical “blade” foldable ($20) SMA-F / 43 in / 20 W / 5.0 dBi

For the SMA-M version see Amazon

Comet SMA-503 2 m / 70 cm mini-whip ($30, see reviews and Amazon and DXE) SMA-M / 9 in / 10 W / 0.0 dBi
• Diamond RH 771 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical whip ($8, see reviews) 10 W / 0.0 dBd gain

Currently installed on some of my Baofeng radios

Diamond SRH 519 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical whip ($27, see reviews and Amazon and DXE) SMA-M / 7.75 in / 10 W / 3.0 dBi
Diamond SRH77CA 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical whip ($23, see reviews and Amazon and DXE) SMA-M / 15 in / 10 W / 6.0 dBi
Diamond SRJ77CA 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical whip ($25, see reviews and Amazon and DXE) SMA-F / 15 in / 10 W / 6.0 dBi
ExpertPower XP-669C 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical whip ($13, see video review) SMA-F / 8 in / 10 W
• HYS Tactical 2 m / 70 cm half-wave tactical “blade” foldable ($24, see reviews and Miklor and QST) SMA-F / 31 in / 20 W / 3.2 dBi

For the SMA-M version see Amazon

MFJ MFJ-1714 Long Ranger 2 m telescopic whip ($17 and $17, see reviews) BNC / 5 W / 0.85 dBd

For the SMA version see MFJ-1714S

This has worked well on my Yaesu FT-60R

Currently installed in our go-kits, and works very well, but no longer comes in SMA (only in BNC)

Currently installed on some of my Baofeng radios

Formerly used with our BTech UV-5X3 radios, but were too long for our go-bags

Previously installed in our go-kits and several HTs, but has low-quality construction, is a bit top-heavy, and breaks way too easily

Also available in SMA-M and BNC
Currently installed on several of my Baofeng HTs
Very difficult-to-beat antenna for performance, flexibility, and weight for the price

Currently installed on my Yaesu FT-60R, Baofeng GT-3TP, and Realistic HTX-202

Currently installed on my Icom IC-V85, along with a 2-meter (19 ½”) counterpoise

Currently installed on our BTech UV-5X3 HTs in our go-bags

TAC-SMA 2 m / 70 cm half-wave tactical “blade” foldable ($40) SMA-M / 31 in / 10 W / 5.2 dBi

VHF / UHF — mobile

Comet CA-2X4SR(NMO) 2 m / 70 cm 7/8-wave vertical fold-over ($65 PL-259 / $65 NMO, see reviews and DXE) PL-259 (NMO) / 40 in / 150 W / 3.8-6.2 dBi
Comet CSB-790A 2 m / 70 cm 7/8-wave vertical fold-over ($100, see reviews and DXE) PL-259 / 62 in / 150 W / 5.1-7.7 dBi
Comet SBB-15NMO 6 m / 2 m / 70 cm 6/8-wave vertical fold-over ($85, see reviews and DXE) PL-259 / 61 in / 120 W / 4.5-7.2 dBi
• Comet SBB-25NMO 2 m 5/8-wave fold-over vertical NMO ($49, see Amazon or reviews) 200 W / 4.1 dBi gain

Currently mounted on our Nissan Xterra
Comet SBB-25 is the PL-259 version ($49, see Amazon)

Comet SBB-5(NMO) 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical fold-over ($59, see reviews) PL-259 (NMO) / 38 in / 120 W / 3.0 dBi
Comet SBB-7(NMO) 2 m / 70 cm 5/8-wave vertical fold-over ($80, see reviews) PL-259 (NMO) / 55 in / 70 W / 4.5 dBi
Comet SS-680SB(NMO) 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical spring-base ($47, see reviews) PL-259 (NMO) / 80 W / 2.15 dBi
Comet UHV-4 quad-band (10 m / 6 m / 2 m / 70 cm) half-wave vertical fold-over ($120, see reviews) PL-259 / 54 in / 100 W / 0.0 dBd
Diamond AZ507RSP 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical spring-base ($47, see DXE) PL-259 / 28 in / 50 W / 2.15-4.9 dBi
Diamond CR320A 2 m / 1.25 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical fold-over ($80, see reviews and DXE) PL-259 / 37 in / 200 W / 2.15-5.5 dBi
Diamond CR8900A quad-band (10 m / 6 m / 2 m / 70 cm) half-wave vertical fold-over ($100, see reviews and DXE) PL-259 / 50 in / 60 W / 2.15-5.5 dBi
• Diamond NR770HNMO 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical fold-over NMO ($54, see reviews) 200 W / 3.0 dBi

Currently installed on my Nissan Versa Note

Diamond HV7A quad-band (10 m / 6 m / 2 m / 70 cm) half-wave vertical fold-over ($110, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 50 in / 200 W / 2.15-5.5 dBi
Diamond SG7500NMO 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical fold-over ($73, see reviews and DXE) NMO / 41 in / 150 W / 3.5-6.0 dBi
Diamond SG7900ANMO 2 m / 70 cm 7/8-wave vertical fold-over ($115, see reviews and DXE) NMO (also PL-259) / 62 in / 150 W / 5.0-7.6 dBi
Hustler LMC-270 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical ($37, see reviews and Amazon) NMO / 38 in / 100 W / 2.4-4.0 dBi
• Hustler SF-2 2 m 5/8-wave vertical mobile ($18, see reviews and manual) 100 W / 3.4 dBi

Currently being used as a component in my (semi) portable kit, along with a homebrew counterpoise, when I really need to transmit omnidirectionally as far as possible by simplex
Previously installed on my house and my car for several years each

Larsen (PulseLarsen) KG2/70CXPL 2 m / 70 cm glass-mount ($130, see reviews and DXE) PL-259 / 33 in / 100 W / 2.15 dBi
Larsen NMO 2/70B 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical (85 cm) NMO ($70, see reviews) 200 W / 1.6 dBd
MFJ MFJ-1412B 2 m / 70 cm half-wave whip ($30, see reviews) 200 W / 0.85 dBd
Nagoya NL-770R 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical ($13, , see reviews) PL-259 / 38 in / 150 W / 3.0-5.5 dBi
• Nagoya TB-320A 2 m / 1.25 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical fold-over PL-259 (39 in) whip ($58, see reviews and Miklor) 200 W / 5.5 dBi
• Nagoya UT-108 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical mag-mount ($23, see reviews) SMA-F / 20 in / 20 W

Used successfully on my vehicle for several months, but has a weak magnet

Nagoya UT-72 2 m / 70 cm 1/4-wave vertical mag-mount ($28, see reviews) PL-259 / 20 in / 80 W / 3.5 dBi
• Tram / Browning BR-180-B 2 m / 70 cm half-wave NMO whip ($40, see reviews) 200 W / 2.4 dBd gain
Tram 1150 2 m 5/8-wave vertical ($20, see reviews) NMO / 49 in / 200 W / 3.0 dBi
• Tram 1180 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical NMO antenna ($30, see reviews)

The $34 Tram 10280 package is the Tram 1180, plus an angled mounting clip, NMO mount, and 17 ft of RG-58 terminated in a PL-259 connector

VHF / UHF — portable

Ailunce AY01 70 cm 3-element Yagi ($50, see reviews and more) SO-239 / 19 in / 50 W / 7.0 dBi
Elk Antennas Elk 2M/440L5 2 m / 70 cm 5-element log periodic ($120, see specs and reviews) SO-239 / 25 in / 200 W / 8.7-9.1 dBi
• hy-gain VB-25FM 2 m 5-element Yagi ($60, see reviews and manual) 250 W / 11.3 dBi

Install your own connector type
Used very successfully on SP50 and KM100

MFJ MFJ-1730 2 m half-wave pocket roll-up J-pole ($40, see Amazon and manual and DXE) BNC / 52 in / 25 W
MFJ MFJ-1972 VHF telescopic whip ($20, see manual and DXE) 3/8-24 / 58 in / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd
• N9TAX Slim Jim 2 m / 70 cm roll-up end-fed folded dipole ($23, see reviews) SO-239 / 54 in / 100 W

Used very successfully on TERT at Stewart Falls with my BTech UV-2501+220 and TYT TH-8600

VHF / UHF — base (external / outdoor)

Currently installed on my roof
Once known as the Blackbird by MTC and Miklor

Currently installed on my roof
Have installed these on many houses
How to install the Pockrus J-pole (shopping list, tools, instructions by Noji)

Comet GP-1 2 m / 70 cm vertical ($75, see Amazon or reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 50 in / 200 W / 3.0 dBi
Comet GP-3 2 m / 70 cm vertical ($85, see Amazon or reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 71 in / 200 W / 4.5 dBi
Comet GP-6 2 m / 70 cm 2 x 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($150, see Amazon or reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 10 ft 2 in / 200 W / 6.5 dBi
Comet GP-9 2 m / 70 cm 3 x 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($215, see Amazon or reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 18 ft 5 in / 200 W / 8.5-11.9 dBi / 92 mph
Comet GP-15 6-2 m / 70 cm 2 x 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($170, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 7 ft 11 in / 150 W / 3.0-6.2-8.6 dBi
Cushcraft ARX-2B Ringo Ranger II 2 m 3 x 5/8-wave base vertical ($100, see reviews and manual) 4.3 m / 1000 W / 7.0 dBi
Cushcraft A270-6S 2 m / 70 cm 3-element + 3-element Yagi ($150, see reviews and manual) 2.8 ft / 350 W / 7.8-7.8 dBd
Diamond CP22E 2 m 2 x 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($55, see reviews and manual) 2.7 m / 200 W / 6.5 dBi (pattern) / 70 mph
Diamond CP610 10 m / 6 m 3-element collinear vertical (230, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 23 ft / 500 W / 3.4-5.5 dBi / 80 mph
Diamond D130J 2 m / 1.25 m / 70 cm / 33 cm / 23 cm 1/4-wave discone ($95, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 67 in / 200 W / 2 dBi
Diamond F22A 2 m 2 x 7/8-wave collinear vertical ($95, see reviews and manual) 3.2 m / 200 W / 6.7 dBi (pattern) / 112 mph
• Diamond F23H 2 m 3 x 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($140, see reviews and manual) 4.5 m / 350 W / 7.8 dBi (pattern) / 90 mph

Was installed on my roof for years – absolutely wonderful antenna

Diamond V2000A 6 m / 2 m / 70 cm half-wave base vertical ($160, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 100 in / 150 W / 2.15-6.2-8.4 dBi / 112 mph
Diamond X200A 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical ($160, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 100 in / 200 W / 6.0-8.0 dBi / 112 mph
Diamond X300A 2 m / 70 cm 2 X 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($130, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 10 ft / 200 W / 6.5-9.0 dBi / 112 mph
• Diamond X50A 2 m / 70 cm 3 X 1/4-wave collilnear vertical ($85, see reviews and manual) 5.6 ft / 200 W / 5.0 dBd gain (pattern)
• Diamond X510HDM 2 m / 70 cm 3 x 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($180, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 17 ft 1 in / 330 W / 8.3-11.7 dBi / 90 mph (pattern)

Currently installed on my roof
X510HDN has the N-connector

Diamond X700HNA 2 m / 70 cm 4 X 5/8-wave collinear vertical ($390, see reviews and DXE) N / 24 ft / 200 W / 9.3-13.0 dBi / 90 mph
• Ed Fong DBJ-1 2 m / 70 cm J-pole ($37, see reviews and Miklor and KM4LGM and QST) SO-239 / 60 in / 75 W / 2.1 dBi
Firestik 2MCKB 2 m 5/8-wave ground plane ($37, see reviews) SO-239 / 45 in / 400 W / 6.0 dBi
Tram 1477 2 m / 70 cm half-wave vertical ($60) SO-239 / 43 in / 150 W / 3.5-6.0 dBd
Tram 1480 2 m / 70 cm 2-element collinear 5/8-wave vertical ($80, see reviews) SO-239 / 100 in / 200 W / 6.0-8.0 dBd / 110 mph
Tram 1481 2 m / 70 cm 3-element collinear 5/8-wave vertical ($110, see reviews) SO-239 / 17 ft / 200 W / 8.3-11.7 dBd / 90 mph

VHF / UHF — other

Arrow II 146/437-10 2 m / 70 cm portable satellite ($109, see reviews) 150 W / 0.0 dBd

How to use the Arrow II and an HT to communicate with satellites (excellent video)

Norwalk Electronics Dominator 6 meters 6 m 5/8-wave ground plane ($220, see reviews) 13 ft / 1500 W / 2.0 dBd

HF antennas

HF — vertical

Butternut HF9V 9-band (80 m to 6 m) ($500, see reviews) 500 W SSB to 2000 W CW / 0.0 dBd
Comet CHA-250B HF / 6 m 1/4-wave radial-less ($380, see reviews and manual) SO-239 / 24 ft / 250 W / 0.85 dBd / 67 MPH
Cushcraft R-8 HF 8-band (40 m to 6 m) ($520, see reviews and manual) SO-239 / 28 ft 6 in / 1500 W / 3.0 dBi
Cushcraft R-9 HF 9-band (80 m to 6 m) radial-less ($630, see reviews and manual) 1500 W
Diamond CP-6AR HF / 6-band (80-40-20-15-10-6) ($420, see reviews and instructions) 200 W / 0.0 dBd
GAP Challenger DX 8-band (80 m to 2 m) ($420, see reviews and manual) 32 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd gain
GAP Titan DX 8-band (80 m to 10 m) radial-less ($490, see reviews and manual) 25 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd gain
hy-gain AV-14AVQ 4-band (40-20-15-10) ($190, see reviews and manual) 1500 W / 0.0 dBd gain
hy-gain AV-18AVQII 5-band (80-40-20-15-10) ($255, see reviews and manual) 18 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd gain
hy-gain AV-680 Patriot 80 m to 6 m 1/4-wave radial-less ($530, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 26 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd gain
hy-gain DX-88 80 m to 10 m ($360, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 25 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd / 75 mph
• Hustler 5-BTV 5-band (80-40-20-15-10) ($230, see reviews and its radials and manual and DXE) terminals / 25 ft / 1000 W / 0.0 dBd / 70 mph

(0.0 dBd gain without radials; alleged 20 dBd gain with symmetric radials)
Currently installed on my roof, including radials for all five bands

Hustler 6-BTV 6-band (80-40-30-20-15-10) ($250, see reviews and Amazon and tuning tips and DXE) terminals / 24 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd / 45 mph
MFJ MFJ-1796 6-band (40 m to 2 m) half-wave radial-less ($300, see manual and reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 12.0 ft / 1500 W
MFJ MFJ-1799 10-band (80 m to 2 m) half-wave radial-less ($410, see manual and DXE) SO-239 / 20.0 ft / 1500 W
• MFJ MFJ-1974 10 m 1/4-wave telescopic stud mount ($40, see manual and DXE) 3/8-24 / 8.2 ft
• MFJ MFJ-1976 12 m to 6 m 1/4-wave telescopic stud mount ($45, see DXE) 3/8-24 / 10.0 ft
• MFJ MFJ-1979 20 m to 6 m 1/4-wave telescopic stud mount ($60, see reviews and manual and DXE) 3/8-24 / 16.9 ft
MFJ MFJ-2389 8-band (80 m to 70 cm) 1/4-wave ($290, see manual and DXE) SO-239 / 8.5 ft / 200 W / 0.0 dBd gain
Solarcon IMAX-2000 CB / 10 m 5/8-wave ($140, see reviews and Amazon) SO-239 / 24 ft / 5000 W / 5.1 dBi

Solarcon IMAX-GPK ground plane kit for IMAX-2000 ($80, see Amazon)

ZeroFive-Antennas 43-foot 10-160 Multiband 80-40-20-15-10 m 1/4-wave fold-over ($390, see reviews and manual) SO-239 / 43 ft / 5000 W / 0.0 dBd gain

HF — mobile and portable

Buddipole Deluxe HF (40 to 10) / 6-2 m rigid dipole ($400, see reviews and manual) 250 W / 0.0 dBd
Buddistick 40-30-20-15-10 m rigid dipole ($139, see reviews and manual) 250 W / 0.0 dBd
Chameleon CHA MPAS portable end-fed ($315, see reviews and manual and Amazon) SO-239 / 100 W / 0.0 dBd
Chameleon V2L mobile (see reviews and manual and DXE) 3/8-24 / 100 W / 0.0 dBd

Requires the base transformer, mobile mount, and tuner

Comet CHV-5X 5-band (40-20-15-10-6) portable rotatable dipole ($320, see reviews and manual) 150 W / 0.85 dBd
Comet H-422 5-band (40-20-15-10) rotatable dipole ($340, see reviews and DXE) SO-239 / 1000 W / 0.0 dBd
Hamstick (QuickStick) HF / 6 m mobile whip ($25, see reviews) 200 W / 0.85 dBd gain
• MFJ MFJ-1610T 10 m whip ($21, see reviews and manual and DXE) 3/8-24 / 250 W / 0.85 dBd
MFJ MFJ-1699T HF / VHF telescopic vertical stud mount ($80, see reviews and manual and DXE) 3/8-24 / 200 W / 50 in

The MFJ MFJ-1699S has the PL-259 mount instead

Somewhat difficult to get to work well (needs more radials and 15 feet of height)
Made many contacts on 20 and 40 meters while on a family outing near Topaz Mountain, Utah

Tarheel Little Tarheel II / LT-II 80 m to 6 m 1/4-wave mobile screwdriver whip ($400, see reviews) 200 W / 1.0 dBd gain
Texas BugCatcher 80 m to 10 m 1/4-wave mobile screwdriver whip (see reviews) 100 W / -2.0 dBd gain
• Yaesu ATAS-100 40 m to 70 cm 1/4-wave mobile screwdriver whip (see specs and reviews) PL-259 / 63 in / 120 W
Yaesu ATAS-120A 40 m to 70 cm 1/4-wave mobile screwdriver whip ($340, see specs and reviews and manual and DXE) PL-259 / 63 in / 120 W

Works with Yaesu FT-100, FT-450D, FT-847, FT-897D, FT-991A

HF — dipole (conventional, fan, G5RV, OCF, folded, etc.)

Alpha Delta DX-EE 4-band (40-20-15-10) parallel dipole ($150, see reviews and manual and DXE and QST) SO-239 / 40 ft / 1000 W / 0.0 dBd
Alpha Delta DX-LB Plus 4-band (80-40-20-10) parallel dipole ($200, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 100 ft / 1000 W / 0.0 dBd
Buckmaster DX-OCF-7 7-band (80-40-20-17-12-10-6) rotatable dipole ($242, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 135 ft / 300 W / 0.0 dBd
Buckmaster DX-OCF-HP 7-band (80-40-20-17-12-10-6) OCF dipole ($350, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 135 ft / 3000 W / 0.0 dBd
Cobra UltraLite Sr 160 m to 10 m parallel extended double Zepp ($126, see reviews and manual) open wire / 140 ft / 1000 W / 0.0 dBd
Frequency Devices 20HWDB 20 m dipole ($51, see reviews) SO-239 / 36 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd
Icom AH-710 folded dipole ($290, see reviews and Amazon and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 81 ft / 150 W / 0.0 dBd
G5RV 4-band (80-40-20-10) double-Zepp dipole plus ($75, see reviews) SO-239 / 102 ft / 2000 W / 0.0 dBd
Maxcon OCF-3K160 7-band (160-80-40-20-17-12-10) OCF dipole ($110, see reviews) SO-239 / 266 ft / 1000 W / 6.0 dBd
Maxcon OCF-3K80 6-band (80-40-20-17-12-10) OCF dipole ($80, see reviews) SO-239 / 133 ft / 1000 W / 6.0 dBd
Maxcon OCF-5K80 6-band (80-40-20-17-12-10) OCF dipole ($140, see reviews) SO-239 / 133 ft / 5000 W / 6.0 dBd
MFJ MFJ-1775 5-band (40-20-15-10-6-2) rotatable dipole ($340, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 14 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd
MFJ MFJ-17754 dual-band (40-20) dipole ($70, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 42 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd
MFJ MFJ-17758 dual-band (80-40) dipole ($100, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 86 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBd
MFJ MFJ-1777 all-band (1.8 to 54 MHz) doublet dipole ($70, see reviews and manual and DXE) 1500 W / 0.0 dBd

Requires a balanced-line tuner

MFJ MFJ-1785 3-band (80-40-20) rotatable dipole ($370, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 33 ft / 1500 W / 0.0 dBi
MFJ MFJ-2299 5-band (80-40-20-10-6) telescopic dipole ($128, see DXE) SO-239 / 34 ft / 200 W / 0.0 dBd
• W8AMZ Carolina Windom 5-band (80-40-20-10-6) OCF dipole ($87, see reviews) SO-239 / 132 ft / 1500 W, 0.0 dBd

Used during several Field Days, but needs 35 feet of height; 80-meter operations require a tuner

ZS6BKW 5-band (40-20-17-12-10) double-Zepp dipole plus ($147, see reviews) SO-239 / 92 ft / 200 W / 0.0 dBd

Requires 70 feet of coax for its matching section, to work properly

HF — beam

Cushcraft A-4S HF 3-band (20-15-10) beam ($720, see reviews and DXE) 2000 W / 8.9 dBi
Cushcraft MA-5B 5-band (20-17-15-12-10) beam ($500, see reviews and DXE) 1200 W / 5.3 dBi
Mosley TA-32-JR 3-band (20-15-10) 2-element beam ($390, see reviews) 1200 W / 3.1 to 5.5 dBd
Mosley TA-33-JR 3-band (20-15-10) 3-element beam ($510, see reviews) 1200 W / 5.8 to 8.0 dBd

HF — other (loop, end-fed, long-wire, specialized, etc.)

AlexLoop 7-band (40-30-20-17-15-12-10) QRP magnetic loop ($400, see reviews) 10 W SSB to 20 W CW / 0.0 dBd
• Godar FM DXR-1000 HF / 6 m / 2 m apartment receive-only telescopic whip (see reviews) 69 in
• MFJ MFJ-1622 HF / 6 m / 2 m apartment whip ($100, see reviews) 200 W / 0.85 dBd
MFJ MFJ-1835 Cobweb 5-band (20-17-15-12-10) half-wave omnidirectional space-restricted ($200, see reviews and manual and DXE) SO-239 / 300 W / 0.85 dBd
• MFJ MFJ-1982HP 80 m to 10 m end-fed half-wave ($100, see reviews [MP] and manual) SO-239 / 132 ft / 800 W / 0.0 dBi

Used this antenna very successfully without a ground during the 76ers Barbecue and Field Day

MFJ MFJ-1982MP HF (80 m to 10 m) end-fed half-wave ($80, see reviews and manual) SO-239 / 132 ft / 300 W / 0.0 dBi
MFJ MFJ-1984MP HF (40 m to 10 m) end-fed half-wave ($70, see reviews and manual and video) SO-239 / 66 ft / 300 W / 0.0 dBi
MyAntennas EFHW-8010 end-fed half-wave ($152, see reviews and QST p. 52-53) 130 ft / 1000 W / 0.85 dBd
MyAntennas EFLW-1K 160 m to 10 m end-fed long-wire ($100, see reviews) 117 ft / 1000 W / 0.85 dBd

Tuner required
ELFW-1.5K is the 1.5 kW version

Ni4L PEF406 HF / 6 m “portable” end-fed 1/4-wave “dipole” ($65, see reviews) 30 ft / 100 W / 0.85 dBd
PackTenna Mini end-fed half-wave ($90, see reviews and manual and QST) 40 ft / 75 W / 0.0 dBd
Ultimax Ultimax-100 80 m to 6 m 1/4-wave end-fed ($85, see reviews) SO-239 / 66 ft / 1500 W / -2.0 dBd

 Wolf River Coil SB1000 HF (80 m to 10 m) 1/4-wave ($70, see reviews) 3/8-24 / 200 W

LiFePO4, Current Drain and the Icom 705/FT-817

Matt explains this very well


The LiFePO4 cells have a nominal voltage of 3.3V, fully charged at 3.6V and fully depleted at 2.5V. So, when fully charged a 4S (4 cells in series which is the standard “12V” configuration) LiFePO4 battery when it comes off the charger should read 14.4V, but this will slowly drop down to around 13.3V when taken off the charger.

The LiPo cells are a little higher with a nominal voltage of 3.7V, fully charged at 4.2V and generally accepted as fully depleted at 3.0V – so when fully charged a 4S LiPo will be 16.8V.

With both chemistry types, it is highly recommended not to use more than 80% battery capacity of the battery – with batteries like the bioenno they usually have a built in BMS (Battery Management System) that auto cuts off when the battery voltage gets to around that level. This BMS also allows the use of chargers without a balancing lead – but use the chargers that they recommend. I would suggest fully charged your bienno would be around 13.3V when fully charged (but off the charger).

I use a 3S LiPo for my FT-817 – it is only 2500mAh, but gives me multiple summit activations for SOTA and is incredibly light. I also have a number of 4S LeFePO4 batteries in 4200 and 8400 capacity that I use with 100W radios like the FT857/FT897 – a little heavier, but still gives me quite a bit of operating time although I do generally drop the power output down to 50-60W. These are all RC (Remote Control) aircraft style batteries and none have a BMS so need to be charged with a balanced charger – not overly expensive. When operating on a drive to summit or doing a WWFF activation (similar to your POTA), I also have a 4S 20Ah LiFePO4 that lasts for hours of use at 100W.

I anticipate that the 4S 4200mAh LiFePO4 batteries will be the primary battery used with my IC-705. Whilst convenient, the Icom 3Ah battery is expensive for what it offers and I doubt that I would go down that route – the BP307 is listed at AUD$180 each, whereas I can get 4S 4200mAh batteries at $80 each (usually under AUD$60 on special). So to get approx 12Ah of battery I would need 4 of the Icom packs (AUD$720) versus 3 of the 4S 4200mAh battery packs (at AUD$240 at normal price). To me it is a no brainer – yes the convenience of the Icom system is great, but bang for buck is way better with the RC style batteries. is similar to what I presently have – add a couple of Anderson Powerpole to them and you have an excellent battery for portable use (I also use a watt meter with mine so that I know how much I have used and when to swap to the second battery if I need to).



RAC National HF Emergency Communications Frequencies

National HF Emergency Communications Frequencies

The following frequencies and modes have been pre-determined for suggested use of the Amateur Radio Emergency Service during a declared emergency, or a disaster declared or otherwise, occurring anywhere in Canada. These frequencies have been registered with the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU) for its listings of Canadian national emergency frequencies in IARU Region 2.

These are suggested frequencies and should not be construed as meaning that other HF frequencies may not be considered for Emcomm operations.

No Amateur Radio operator or group has exclusive ownership of any particular frequency on any band and, while common sense and courtesy logically would dictate that other Radio Amateurs should keep clear of frequencies being used for emergency or disaster operations, the affected ARES Net Control Station (NCS) must be prepared to move up or down from the pre-determined frequency, as required, in order to conduct operations. Entering into an on-air argument must be avoided.

80 M 3.675 MHz LSB Alfa 3.535 MHz Golf 3.596 MHz Mike
40 M 7.135 MHz LSB Bravo 7.035 MHz Hotel 7.096 MHz November
20 M 14.135 MHz USB Charlie 14.035 MHz India 14.096 MHz Oscar
17 M 18.135 MHz USB Delta 18.075 MHz Juliet 18.096 MHz Papa
15 M 21.235 MHz USB Echo 21.035 MHz Kilo 21.096 MHz Quebec
10 M 28.235 MHz USB Foxtrot 28.035 MHz Lima 28.096 MHz Romeo


The frequencies may also be used during a local ARES exercise or for RAC/ARRL Simulated Emergency Test (SET) operations held annually each Fall, provided such operations do not interfere with those of higher priority.

Each frequency has been given a tactical designation to facilitate quick change to another pre-determined frequency and/or mode by simply indicating the designation. Use of the tactical designations, while optional, is encouraged.

In all cases, these frequencies must be considered as being “plus or minus” to allow for QRM or other conditions impeding useful communications.

Should two or more ARES units wish to use a frequency at the same time for a simulated emergency exercise, consideration should be given to making the exercise “joint” and to work together.  Failing that, the frequency should go to the ARES group that first began operations there. Of course, if a real emergency should occur during the exercise and the frequency is required, the unit conducting the exercise is expected to cease transmissions immediately, relinquish the frequency and stand by in case assistance is requested.

Comments and suggestions concerning this list may be submitted, or for further information, please contact the Community Services Officer .





Icom 705 Portable Radio – Top Ten WANTS Review

  1. Side Rails
  2. Plexiglass screen cover that snaps on
  3. Side Rails
  4. Plexiglass screen cover that snaps on
  5. Side Rails
  6. Plexiglass screen cover that snaps on
  7. Side Rails
  8. Plexiglass screen cover that snaps on
  9. Side Rails
  10. Plexiglass screen cover that snaps on


I also want the Icom 705a special edition in vegetato, milcam or Japanese Defense themed

Icom 705 Portable Radio – Top Ten Review

Here is what I like about the Icom 705 after spending a bit of time with it.

This radio is not for everyone and one may prefer a lower cost FT-817/818 or higher cost KX2/3. What is your use case for it?

It is a perfect shack-in-bag radio

It is not a mobile radio but can be used as one

It is not a handheld radio to wear on your belt

It is not a beach radio as you will find that sand will scratch the display eventually

It is not a Field Day radio unless you are in the QRP battery category

It  is the perfect shelf, bedside or desktop radio in a home office

It has DStar which is the best digital mode going these days and simple to use

First thing is to install and format the SD card (max 32GB)

Then execute the software updates

Then load the memories using the CS-705 software. I did my file in advance so it was easy to get it all set up the same day. I broke out my memories in groups HF, 6m, 2m, 70cm and Dstar

My Icom 705 Use cases:

Owning Icom’s biggest handheld since the Icom 32AT

Portable radio for SOTA and POTA

IF for a SG Labs 1296 and 222 transverter and future 10 GHz radio

Ok Top Ten Likes

  1. Operates just like a 7300 and 9700 so learning curve is simple
  2. Huge Display
  3. The display is readable outdoors in sunlight
  4. TX Delay available for each band so useful with Transverters
  5. Great battery life (expect more with the new high capacity battery)
  6. USB port for rig control (If I choose to but there are smartphone apps to use)
  7. Excellent SW receiver
  8. SD card for voice and cw memory
  9. USB port for battery charging
  10. Excellent audio

OK Dislikes

  1. Huge Display – Its going to get whacked at one point in the field
  2. USB port for battery charging – takes 3 hours
  3. W-LAN is 2.4GHz not 5Ghz
  4. LC-192 is small at 10×14 inches but I haven’t seen one in person yet
  5. Price – yeah its expensive but then this is a very feature rich radio with no others to compare too

Right now until I get to see the backpack I have 3 carrying options:

Topo Design Camera cube

Lowe Pro camera bag

Think Tank Camera Backpack – closest to the LC192 and I can add a side stiffener for the antenna

Pelican Box

The Yaesu FT-817 whip works great with the radio with the simple addition of a elbow BNC connector


I will say one thing and hopefully over time I change my point of view but the radio is a box that lies on its back. We have solved the problem with tripods, stands (I think I am going to hack out my Windcamp 817 stand) and using a wooden I used with my KX3. I really really prefer the Icom 703 and FT-817 form factor as it slides easily into my Think Tank Commuter bag. This boxy radio will expose its screen that could get bumped or damaged. We will have to see what happens after people actually take the radio outdoors. We all know the KX3 can get dust and sand inside.

I knicked my 7300 display so I am sure I can do it again on a field radio. That’s why I prefer the 7200 for outdoors. Its rugged and designed for that usage and the top is spill proof where the 7300 has openings for a soda to spill into and fry it up quick.




How the Navy SEALs wound up buying 450 counterfeit radio antennas

How the Navy SEALs wound up buying 450 counterfeit radio antennas

Danger ahead.
By Justin Rohrlich

Geopolitics reporter

Last spring, the Pentagon spent more than $165,000 on a set of sophisticated radio antennas for a contingent of elite Navy SEALs. Unfortunately, they were cheap knockoffs, courtesy of a California vendor apparently looking to secure some extra profit.

search warrant application recently filed by the Defense Department provides a glimpse into how the alleged scam worked.

In April 2019, the Naval Special Warfare Command solicited bids to buy 450 VHF/UHF antennas for use by members of the Navy SEALs. The request required the body-worn antennas come from New York-based manufacturer Mastodon Design, and that the supplier qualify as a small business.

The government used to purchase the antennas directly from Mastodon. However, it no longer could because after Mastodon’s sale to a large multinational defense contractor, the once-boutique company no longer qualified as a small business. This meant the Navy would have to buy Mastodon’s antennas through an authorized small distributor or reseller.

On May 1, the sales team at Mastodon got an email from the procurement department of a California company called Vizocom. It said the company was bidding on a Navy contract and wanted to know how much 450 Mastodon antennas would cost. Mastodon quoted a price: $165,109.50.

Vizocom then submitted its bid to the Navy for the exact same amount. A source with direct knowledge of the situation told Quartz it was highly unusual that Vizocom wouldn’t want to make any money on the deal. At this price, the Navy awarded Vizocom the contract.

The company, however, would never actually place the order with Mastodon. Instead, it would import low-cost antennas from China and pass them off as from Mastodon using fake serial numbers and spec sheets, according to the search warrant application and sources with knowledge of the deal.

The Navy realized something was amiss when it distributed the antennas to the SEALs who would be using them in the field. Vizocom’s antennas “differed physically” from the Mastodon antennas they had used before and “were of poorer quality,” says the search warrant application.

Investigators eventually discovered a purchase order issued to Alpha Antenna by Vizocom that requested testing, packaging, and shipping to the Navy 450 antennas for just $12,208.50. Alpha seemed to be an unwitting participant in the alleged Vizocom scam, according to a source close to the case.

“The use of these so-called middlemen who don’t manufacture anything, they just order it from someone else that does manufacture it, can be a problem,” Neil Gordon, an attorney who oversees the contractor misconduct database at the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit government watchdog, told Quartz. “The longer the supply chain, the more difficult it is to keep watch over it.”

Despite these kinds of problems plaguing the US armed forces, under US president Donald Trump, the Justice Department has prosecuted fewer of these types of cases, Gordon said. Cutting down on procurement fraud prosecutions against businesses became a DOJ policy goal in early 2018 in an attempt to, among other things, “preserve limited resources.” The department has managed to dismiss 34 of 36 such cases since then. (US attorney general William Barr, the nation’s top cop, has called the False Claims Act an “abomination.”)

The Justice Department still managed to claw back more than $3 billion in settlements and judgments involving fraud and false claims by federal contractors during the government’s 2019 fiscal year, which ended Oct. 1, 2018. And just this week, US Technologies, a New Jersey electronics supplier, agreed to pay $525,000 to settle allegations that it sold the military dozens of faulty circuit card assemblies—some of which were counterfeit—destined for a US Air Force weapons system.

As for Vizocom, it has earned more than $30 million from US government sales since 2016, per an official government spending database. The Navy has accounted for about 15% of its business, with the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Department of State making up the balance.

“Vizocom’s vision is to succeed in its goal to bring about a better world, thru making technological advancement to give all people access to a better life,” its website says. “We believe we can only make this happen by upholding genuine universal values we all cherish on a daily basis and in all stages of like [sic]…We work as a team and deal with others with integrity, we deliver service excellence, and we seek success by working hard hand in hand in an open collaborative professional environment with our staff, our customers, as well as our vendors and suppliers. We build capacity by seeing the goodness in people. We build trust by trusting first.”

If the company’s mission, misspellings and all, didn’t raise eyebrows among investigators, its headquarters sure did. The company says it is located on the third floor of a 20-story skyscraper in downtown San Diego. In reality, its physical footprint is little more than a mailbox in a shared virtual office space. Vizocom is actually located at the El Cajon, California address the company had on file with the federal government. When investigators paid it a visit, they found a small single-family home occupied by Vizocom’s owner.

Authorities searched the house just before Christmas, seizing 49 antennas and assorted electronics, expecting to find evidence of wire fraud, among other federal crimes, as well as communications between Vizocom and its own suppliers that may yet help to untangle the rest of the case.

“What a brazen criminal act that could have potentially contributed to the loss of life of some of our SEALs who are placing themselves in extremely risky situations,” former FBI agent Dennis Franks told Quartz. “It is horrendous that greed on the part of a few individuals could create a situation in which the ability to communicate with other team members or command centers could be hampered and thereby prevent critical information from being sent or received.”

Mastodon filed a civil lawsuit against Vizocom. And after Vizocom agreed to abide by a judge’s injunction, the two companies settled their case at the end of November. The investigation into Vizocom is ongoing, and no official charges have been filed as of yet. Neither representatives from the Defense Department nor Vizocom responded to requests for comment.

The military renaissance in high frequency communications

The military renaissance in high frequency communications

LONDON — Special operations commands across Europe are ramping up their capabilities with high-frequency communications to ensure connectivity on the battlefield. Leaders there are turning to high frequency communications as a way to optimize properties that provide a low probability of interception and detection.

Special forces in France, Germany, Poland and Ukraine continue to receive high-frequency, or HF, systems as a way to diversify communications plans, industry sources confirmed to C4ISRNET.

Some special operations organizations have selected L3Harris’ AN/PRC-160(V), industry sources said.

Enhancements in HF come at a time when NATO members and partner forces are suffering from a disruption of satellite communications, particularly along the alliance’s eastern flank where Russian armed forces continue to conduct electronic warfare.

In an online presentation to the Association of Old Crows on Aug. 6, Paul Denisowski, product management engineer at Rohde and Schwarz North America, described how communications satellites are vulnerable to antisatellite systems as well as ground-, air- and space-based “kill vehicles.”

“China, Russia and the U.S. have all carried out ASAT tests and many other countries are developing ASAT capabilities,” Denisowski said, using an acronym for anti-satellite. To boost resilience, some commands are turning to high-frequency communications.

During the presentations “Lost Art of HF” and the “Rebirth of Shortwave in a Digital World,” Denisowski explained that HF is making a comeback in local and global communications. This renaissance comes as the result of improvements in a range of fields, including antenna design, digital modulation schemes and improved understanding of propagation.

The market is also helped by reductions in size, weight and power requirements as well as the introduction of wideband data, enhanced encryption algorithms and interoperability with legacy HF sets, he said.

“This means end users are now benefiting from easier-to-use and cheaper solutions featuring improved data performance, audio quality, availability and operation. And because of a lack of infrastructure, HF is less expensive and relatively robust, although solar events may temporarily disrupt HF communications,” he said. Specific upgrades include “Adaptive HF,” which comprises automatic selection of frequency and the establishment of communication through automatic link establishment, or ALE, technology.

The latest technology of its type — 4G ALE — is capable of supporting wideband HF communications, or WBHF for short, providing end users with the ability to “negotiate bandwidth, modulation type, error correction and the number of sub-carriers,” Denisowski explained.

“ALE selects frequencies using link quality analysis, which allows it to listen and determine if a channel is in use and adapt if conditions change,” he said.

He added that HF can now support data rates up to 240 kilobytes per second on a 48-kilohertz channel, particularly useful for more robust communications in hostile environments.

“WBHF has already [been] used in military trials. It’s a technology which is most definitely here and now,” Denisowski said.

Similar sentiments from Europe were expressed to C4ISRNET, where armed forces continue to integrate HF technologies into existing and future communications plans. Examples include Germany’s Ministry of Defence, which is deciding whether to include an HF requirement as part of its wider Digital Land Based Operations communications program.

According to a report by JK Defence and Security, a partner of L3Harris Technologies in Germany, HF communications comprise a viable alternative to satellite communications tech available to European NATO partners.

The report explained how the U.S. Army and European NATO partners explored such scenarios during a series of joint exercises in 2019 and 2020. “A new need arrives for alternative communication skills, justified through the increasing vulnerability from SATCOM jamming as well as the potential failure of SATCOM as a result of attacks on spacecraft or through the use of anti-satellite surface-to-air missiles,” the report’s author, Jan Pätzold, told C4ISRNET. “The development of alternative skills is important to reduce dependence on SATCOM.”

According to Pätzold, so-called Skywave HF, which bounces signals off the ionosphere, enables beyond line-of-sight communications across “thousands of kilometers” without requirements. HF communications is also ideally suited to supporting local network coverage. “This offers advantages over SATCOM in urban areas, but also in mountainous areas or far north latitudes where no line of sight to existing satellites is possible,” Pätzold said

Trying the new ISS FM repeater. It is QRV!

I couldn’t wait to try the new ISS FM repeater myself.

ISS FM repeater information

Downlink: 437.800 +/- doppler

Uplink: 145.990 (67hz PL Tone)

Download ISS Tracker to know when the ISS is overhead   At night you can see it with binoculars move across the sky
Put the uplink in a memory channel and then add more memories to cover the downlink with plus or minus for doppler
I would make it every 2.5 or 5khz       so start at 437.750 to 473.800
Use split mode on the VFOs or memory channels so you always transmit on input and then receive on the output
As the satellite passes over , the frequency will shift and you just follow the shift by cycling through memory channels.
Most often a Arrow Satellite Yagi will be needed and one hand is needed to arc the antenna cross the satellite passes. Keep contacts really short and allow others to use it as well.
Exchange is Callsign and Grid Square
Thanks to Kenwood for supply the radio